RESEARCH REGARDING USING CICHORIUM INTYBUS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE PALATABILITY OF CATTLE FEEDSTUFF

Authors

  • Radu Neamț Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author
  • Florin Neciu Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author
  • Gheorghe Săplăcan Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author
  • Ciprian Mihali Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author
  • Ludovic Cziszter Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author
  • Silviu Săplăcan Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author
  • Alexandru Mizeranschi Research and Development Station for Bovine - Arad, Calea Bodrogului 32, CP 310059, Romania The Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine "King Mihai I of Romania", Timisoara, in Timisoara, Faculty of Bioengineering of Animal Resources, Calea Aradului 119, CP 300645, Romania University “Aurel Vlaicu” Arad, Faculty of Economics, Bulevardul Revoluției 77, CP 310130, e mail: , Romania Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1199/hp4x1e34

Keywords:

cattle feeding, chicory, feeding efficiency, palatability, Romanian Spotted breed

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate the opportunity of including chicory in cows’ diets based on its palatability compared to other usual feeds. A total of 1500 data were recorded from 150 Romanian Spotted cows related to 6 forage structures: alfalfa (αα), chicory (C), mixed alfalfa and chicory (αC), mixed gramineous (G), mixed gramineous and alfalfa (Gα), mixed gramineous and chicory (GC). Data aimed at the total amount of forage consumption (TFC), according to forage structures and day of feeding. The palatability was assessed based on one-way analysis of variance protocol, with the categorical factor “feedstuff”. The Chi-square test of independence was performed to determine if the botanical structure had an influence on palatability. No significant differences (p>0.05) were recorded related to αα (90.14%), C (87.56%), or αC (89.26%). The lowest palatability was recorded for G (71.35%) compared to αα, C, and αC (p≤0.001) or Gα and GC (p≤0.01). Current results suggest that the participation of C in botanical mixtures could improve the feedstuff palatability, with economic benefits.

References

Leonard C., Ebenezer T., URL:https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/leonard-cockayne-and ebenezer-teichelmann; 2013; (Ministry for Culture and Heritage), updated 15-Jul-2013

Lancashire J.A.; Improved species and seasonal pasture production; 1978; Proceedings of Agronomy Society of New Zealand, 8, pp. 123 – 127

Sanderson M.A., Labreveux M., Hall M.H., Elwinger G.F.; Nutritive value of chicory and english plantain forage; 2003; Crop Sci., 43, pp. 1797-1804

Neciu F.C.; Cercetări privind agrobiologia și utilizarea cicorii furajere (Cichorium intibus L.); 2018; Universitatea de Științe Agricole și Medicinã Veterinară a Banatului „Regele Mihai I al României" din Timișoara

Terrill T.H., Rowan A.M., Douglas G.B., Barry T.N.; Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains; 1992; Journal of Science Food and Agriculture, 58, pp. 321-329

Hopkins D.L., Holst P.J., Hall D.G., Atkinson W.R.; Carcass and meat quality of second-cross crytorchid lambs grazed on chicory (Cichorium intybus) or lucerne (Medicago sativa); 1995; Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 35, pp. 693 – 697

Nwafor I.C., Karabo S.K., Chilaka M.A.; Chemical Composition and Nutritive Benefits of Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as an Ideal Complementary and/or Alternative Livestock Feed Supplement; 2017; The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 7343928, pp. 11

Foster J.G., Clapham W.M., Belesky D.P., Labreveux M., Hall M.H., Sanderson M.A.; Influence of cultivation site an sesquiterpene lactone composition of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.); 2006; J. Agric. Food Chem, 54, pp. 1772 – 1778

Baumont R., Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants. A review.; 1996; Annales de zootechnie, 45(5), pp. 385- 400

Faverdin P.; Regulation de l’ingestion des vaches laitibres en debut de lactation; 1985; These de doctorat, Ina-PG, France, pp. 131

Parsons A.J., Newman J.A., Penning P.D., Harvey A., Orr R.J.; Diet preference of sheep: effect of recent diet, physiological state and species abundance; 1994; J. Anim. Ecol., 63, pp. 465-478

Hill T., Lewicki P.; Statistics: Methods and Applications; 2007; Stat Soft, Tulsa, OK, USA

DeVries T.J., M.A.G. von Keyserlingk; Time of feed delivery affects the feeding and lying patterns of dairy cows; 2005; J. Dairy Sci, 88, pp. 625-631

Niderkorn V., Martin C., Bernard M., Le A., Morvan, Rochette Y., Baumont R.; Effect of increasing the proportion of chicory in forage-based diets on intake and digestion by sheep; 2019; Animal, 13(4), pp. 718-726

Totty V., Greenwood S., Bryant R., Edwards G.; Nitrogen partitioning and milk production of dairy cows grazing simple and diverse pastures; 2013; Journal of Dairy Science, 96, pp. 141–149

Roca-Fernández A., Peyraud J-L., Delaby L., Delagarde R.; Pasture intake and milk production of dairy cows rotationally grazing on multi-species swards; 2016; Animal, 10, pp. 1448–1456

Hunt W.F., Hay J.M.; A photographic technique for evaluating the pasture species performance of grazing animals; 1990; Journal of New Zealand Grasslands, 51, pp. 191–195

Atanas K., Ina S., Viliana V.; Palatability of Annual and Perennial Legumes; 2016; Nutri Food Sci Int J., 1(5), pp. 555- 573

Madruga A., Abril R.S., González L.A., Manteca X., Panella-Riera N., Gil M., Ferret A.; Using 19% of alfalfa hay in beef feedlot finishing diets did not modify meat quality but increased feed intake and ADG; 2019; J Anim Sci., 97(5), pp. 2076- 2086

Minneé E.M.K., Waghorn G.C., Lee J.M., Clark C.E.F; Including chicory or plantain in a perennial ryegrass/white clover- based diet of dairy cattle in late lactation: Feed intake, milk production and rumen digestion; 2017; Animal Feed Science and Technology, 227, pp. 52-61

Clark D., Anderson C., Hongwen G.; Liveweight gain and intake of Friesian bulls grazing ‘Grasslands Puna’ chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) or pasture; 1990; New Zeal J Agric Res., 33, pp. 219–24

Woodward S.L., Waugh C.D., Roach C.G., Fynn D., Phillips J.; Are diverse species mixtures better pastures for dairy farming?; 2013; Proc New Zeal Grassl Assoc., 75, pp. 79–84

Muir S., Ward G., Jacobs J.; Milk production and composition of mid-lactation cows consuming perennial ryegrass-and chicory-based diets; 2014; J. Dairy Sci., 97, pp. 1005–15

Drescher M., I. Heitkönig, J.G. Raats, H.H. Prins; The role of grass stems as structural foraging deterrents and their effects on the foraging behaviour of cattle; 2006; Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 101, pp. 10-26

Stewart A.; Plantain (Plantago lanceolata)—A potential pasture species; 1996; Proc. N.Z. Grassl. Assoc., 58, pp. 77-86

Hoskin S., Stafford K., Barry T.; Digestion, rumen fermentation and chewing behaviour of red deer fed fresh chicory and perennial ryegrass; 1995; The Journal of Agricultural Science, 124(2), pp. 289-295

Gregorini P., Minnee E.M.K., Griffiths W., Lee J.M.; Dairy cows increase ingestive mastication and reduce ruminative chewing when grazing chicory and plantain; 2013; J. Dairy Sci., 96, pp. 7798-7805

Scharenberg Anna, Arrigo Y., Gutzwiller A., Soliva C.R., Wyss U., Kreuzer M., Dohme-Meier F.; Palatability in sheep and invitro nutritional value of dried and ensiled sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), and chicory (Cichorium intybus); 2008; Archives of Animal Nutrition, 61(6), pp. 481-96

Lombardi D., Vasseur E., Berthiaum R., DeVries T.J., Bergeron R.; Feeding preferences and voluntary feed intake of dairy cows: Effect of conservation and harvest time of birdsfoot trefoil and chicory; 2015; Journal of Dairy Science, 98(10), pp. 7238-7247

Guangdi Li, Hayes R.C., Matthew Gardner, Jeff McCormick, Matthew Newell, Graeme Sandral, Richard Lowrie, Hao Zhang; Companion legume species maximise productivity of chicory (Cichoruim intybus). "Capturing Opportunities and Overcoming Obstacles in Australian Agronomy"; 2012; Edited by I. Yunusa. Proceedings of 16th Australian Agronomy Conference 2012, Armidale, NSW

Kunelius H.T., McRae K.B.; Forage chicory persists in combination with cool season grasses and legumes; 1999; Can. J. Plant Sci., 79(2), pp. 197-200

Matthew G., Jason Condon, Brian Dear, Mark Conyers, Guangdi Li; Chicory increases the level of N fixation by companion legumes; 2010; Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture, Proceedings of the 15th Australian Agronomy Conference, Lincoln, New Zealand 15-18 November 2010

Bargo F., Muller L.D., Delahoy J.E.; Milk response to concentrate supplementation of high producing dairy cows grazing at two pasture allowances; 2002; Journal of Dairy Science, 85(7), pp. 1777-1792

Peyraud J.L., Comeron E.A., Wade M.H.; The effect of daily herbage allowance, herbage mass and animal factors upon herbage intake by grazing dairy cows; 1996; Annales de Zootechnie, 45(3), pp. 201-217

Dalley D.E., Roche J.R., Grainger C.; Dry matter intake, nutrient selection and milk production of dairy cows grazing rainfed perennial pastures at different herbage allowances in spring; 1999; Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 39(8), pp. 923-931

Hodgson J., Brooks I.M.; Nutrition of grazing animals; 1999; In: White, J. and Hodgson, J. eds. New Zealand pasture and crop science, Oxford University Press, Auckland

Parga J., Peyraud J.L., Delagarde R.; Age of regrowth affects grass intake and ruminal fermentations in grazing dairy cows. In: Durand, J.L., Emile, J.C., Huyghe, C., et al. eds. Multifunction grasslands: quality forages, animal products and landscapes: proceedings of the 19th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, La Rochelle, France; 27-30 May 2002; European Grassland Federation., Versailles, 256-257. Grassland Science in Europe no. 7

Koldmae H, Kirsel R, Toelp J., Vadi M.; On the crude fibre content of grass feeds; 1999; Proceedings of the Institute of Animal Husbandry of the Estonian Agricultural University, 68, pp. 25-32

Lee M.R.F., Harris L.J., Moorby J.M.; Rumen metabolism and nitrogen flow to the small intestine in steers offered Lolium perenne containing different levels of water-soluble carbohydrate; 2002; Animal Science, 74(3), pp. 587-596

Taweel H.Z., Tas B.M., Smit H.J.; Improving the quality of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) for dairy cows by selecting for fast clearing and/or degradable neutral detergent fiber; 2005; Livestock Production Science, 96 (2/3), pp. 239- 248

Chiy P., Phillips C.; The rate of intake of sweet, salty and bitter concentrates by dairy cows; 1999; Animal Science, 68(4), 731-740

Chiy P.C., Phillips C.J.C., Bello M.R.; Sodium fertilizer application to pasture. II. Effect on dairy cow production and behaviour, Grass and Forage Science; 1993; 48, pp. 203–212

Sanderson M.A., Corson M.S., Rotz C.A., Soder K.J.; Economic analysis of forage mixture productivity in pastures grazed by dairy cattle; 2006; Online. Forage and Grazinglands, doi: 10.1094/FG-2006-0929-01-RS

Belesky D.P., Turner K.E., Fedders JM., Ruckle J.M.; Productivity, botanical composition, and nutritive value of forage chicory; 1999; Agron. J., 91, pp. 450-456

Garrett K., Beck M.R., Marshall C.J., Logan C.M., Maxwell T.M.R., Greer A.W., Gregorini P.; Effects of incorporating plantain, chicory, and alfalfa into a ryegrass-based diet on in vitro gas production and fermentation characteristics; 2021; Applied Animal Science, 37(4), pp. 367-376

Downloads

Published

2024-08-01